Announcement Announcement Module
Collapse
No announcement yet.
What AP is NOT Page Title Module
Move Remove Collapse
Conversation Detail Module
Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • harmonicker's Avatar
    Senior Forum Member
    • Mar 2008
    • 576

    What AP is NOT

    #1
    To help those new to AP let's talk about what AP is NOT in parenting...

  • harmonicker's Avatar
    Senior Forum Member
    • Mar 2008
    • 576

    #2
    AP is not new...been around for a long time......and it just comes naturally....I like to think of it as human nature parenting.

    Comment


    • PaxMamma's Avatar
      Forum Administrator and Casualty of Love
      • Mar 2008
      • 1707

      #3
      NOT permissive parenting....

      Comment


      • naomifrederickmd's Avatar
        Senior Forum Member
        • Mar 2008
        • 1317

        #4
        AP is not behaving as if your child is a "little emperor" --but treating your child as a human with needs, feelings and complex motivations. AP is not forcing your child to fit into your life, but creating a new life that fosters all family members needs.

        Comment


        • EcoMaMa's Avatar
          Senior Moderator Being The Change I Want To See!
          • Mar 2008
          • 535

          #5
          Not being a breastfeeding mother or babywearing parent, it is a lifetime commitment to nurture our families. AP families just happen to do those things.

          I have families who have told me that they breastfed and have done the AP thing and their kids were too big. (Ages 2 and up)

          Comment


          • mumtoone's Avatar
            Junior Forum Member
            • May 2008
            • 101

            #6
            AP is not 'giving in' - Its treating your baby as you would want to be treated in the same situation.

            Comment


            • Kelly's Avatar
              Senior Moderator
              • Mar 2008
              • 479

              #7
              It is not hippie! A suburban soccer mom can be just as intuitive, empathic and responsive to her children as anyone else.

              Comment


              • havecompassion's Avatar
                Junior Forum Member
                • Mar 2008
                • 77

                #8
                AP is not for Mom's only.

                Comment


                • PaxMamma's Avatar
                  Forum Administrator and Casualty of Love
                  • Mar 2008
                  • 1707

                  #9
                  Originally posted by havecompassion View Post
                  AP is not for Mom's only.

                  totally agree!

                  Comment


                  • EcoMaMa's Avatar
                    Senior Moderator Being The Change I Want To See!
                    • Mar 2008
                    • 535

                    #10
                    Well apparently this guy has a list of what AP is not and thinks it is?
                    http://www.bestnaturalparenting.info...-for-children/

                    Comment


                    • PaxMamma's Avatar
                      Forum Administrator and Casualty of Love
                      • Mar 2008
                      • 1707

                      #11
                      WHAT??!! WHO is this guy? and where did he get so much misguided information? for an "expert", he sure provides a lot of unintelligent ideas.

                      Comment


                      • runrebeccaray's Avatar
                        New Forum Member
                        • Apr 2008
                        • 49

                        #12
                        ah, he's perpetuating the "child-centered" negativity that surrounds AP. I hate it when folks think we absolutely neglect ourselves. i guess they failed to read the 8th principle. we are family centered!! if the AP style of parenting is so tough on my marriage, then how in the world did we conceive baby #2, Mr. Grose?
                        --Rebecca

                        Comment


                        • PaxMamma's Avatar
                          Forum Administrator and Casualty of Love
                          • Mar 2008
                          • 1707

                          #13
                          not just that, his entire concept was off! AP and EC have nothing to do w/each other. and, even in the AP community, nursing until 6 is quite rare! these are not the point of AP at all!!

                          Comment


                          • PaxMamma's Avatar
                            Forum Administrator and Casualty of Love
                            • Mar 2008
                            • 1707

                            #14
                            not just that, his entire concept was off! AP and EC have nothing to do w/each other. and, even in the AP community, nursing until 6 is quite rare! these are not the point of AP at all!!

                            we have quite a few families in our group w/multiple kids. one just gave birth to #8 and another will soon have #5. nearly all of us have more than 1.

                            Comment


                            • Kelly's Avatar
                              Senior Moderator
                              • Mar 2008
                              • 479

                              #15
                              That infuriates me, reading articles like that. From someone who has NO idea. I work really hard to advocate AP and educate people about what it really entails, and then to read an article like that from a parenting "expert"...it just fuels mainstream parents' argument for traditional discipline. grrrr...

                              Originally posted by PaxMamma View Post
                              AP and EC have nothing to do w/each other.
                              This is just a side note, but I actually think that AP and EC have a lot to do with each other....It's all about being in close communication with your child's needs. But one is not an indicator of the other, and you're right that it shouldn't have been lumped in to his "argument"!

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X