We have always practiced attachment parenting, even before I knew it had a name. My husband and I are both animal scientists by education, and behaviorism is the accepted theory for animal behavior. So ideas about attachment theory and behavior were new to me when I first had children. But they simply made sense to me on a gut level - people are not animals, and rewards/punishments seemed to be the wrong approach for teaching children. It wasn't until I heard Gordon Neufeld speak for the first time that I started exploring the science behind attachment and learned that behaviorism is, in fact, not accepted for people and hasn't been for years, and the science behind that. But, behaviorism is still the basis of most of the parenting ideas and techniques out there.
The "gurus" of attachment parenting - Neufeld, Kohn, etc. all state more or less that with an intact, attached relationship, the child "wants" to be "right" with the parent. So the idea as I understand it, is that if you use the ideas of attachment theory for babies and toddlers, are responsive to your child, honor their emotions, trust them, avoid puishment & discipline practices that lead to detachment, then by the time they're older, they will simply "want" to be right with you and you'll avoid a lot of discipline struggles off the bat.
Okay, but what if that's not happening? I hadn't really acknowledged how far we've come from the "ideal" w/ discipline until we had another baby. Now we've got a toddler and two 8 year olds. The toddler is easy! I realize how "good" I was as a parent when my twins were babies and toddlers and preschoolers. The struggles were, and are, sometimes intense, but I really do see how the attachment works and how working with that attachment helps resolve the conflict.
It doesn't work with the big kids. I don't see that drive to be "right" with Mom and Dad. And the behaviors we're struggling with are so much more intense, difficult, potentially having long-term consequences. My big frustration right now is that I can't find resources. I've read and re-read books like "Spirited Child", "Hold onto Your Kids", "Unconditional Parenting". The only book I've found that seems to address this at all is "Explosive Child". The therapists and counselors we can find all use behaviorism - "consequences" (which is a nice name for punishment), reward schedules, and the like.
I homeschool my big kids, and am part of a large local homeschooling group made up mostly of parents who share our ideals and beliefs about raising children. For the majority of the kids, the idea that the child wants to be "right" w/ the parent works. These are what a handful of us call the "easy" kids. Sure, there are struggles, but they can be resolved w/in the attachment relationship. The child seems as upset as the parent when they are in conflict. And then there are kids like mine, who are not "easy". Some of these children have been diagnoses w/ conditions like ODD, ADHD, autism spectrum, etc. Others have not, or have not been tested. We are currently looking into having one, if not both, of our children evaluated for these sorts of conditions.
But I still need discipline ideas. I love the ideal of attachment theory, but it's a long-term solution/goal. What do I do in the moment? I cannot remember the last time we got through a day without a meltdown, usually more than one. We make sure they're physically right (fed, enough sleep, not overly scheduled), and I can predict when something is physicallly not right. But sometimes, usually!, there's no such convenient explantion. It seems like there's a huge gap for the big kids between attachment theory and actual, practical, day-to-day options that don't involve punitive discipline/behaviorism.
The "gurus" of attachment parenting - Neufeld, Kohn, etc. all state more or less that with an intact, attached relationship, the child "wants" to be "right" with the parent. So the idea as I understand it, is that if you use the ideas of attachment theory for babies and toddlers, are responsive to your child, honor their emotions, trust them, avoid puishment & discipline practices that lead to detachment, then by the time they're older, they will simply "want" to be right with you and you'll avoid a lot of discipline struggles off the bat.
Okay, but what if that's not happening? I hadn't really acknowledged how far we've come from the "ideal" w/ discipline until we had another baby. Now we've got a toddler and two 8 year olds. The toddler is easy! I realize how "good" I was as a parent when my twins were babies and toddlers and preschoolers. The struggles were, and are, sometimes intense, but I really do see how the attachment works and how working with that attachment helps resolve the conflict.
It doesn't work with the big kids. I don't see that drive to be "right" with Mom and Dad. And the behaviors we're struggling with are so much more intense, difficult, potentially having long-term consequences. My big frustration right now is that I can't find resources. I've read and re-read books like "Spirited Child", "Hold onto Your Kids", "Unconditional Parenting". The only book I've found that seems to address this at all is "Explosive Child". The therapists and counselors we can find all use behaviorism - "consequences" (which is a nice name for punishment), reward schedules, and the like.
I homeschool my big kids, and am part of a large local homeschooling group made up mostly of parents who share our ideals and beliefs about raising children. For the majority of the kids, the idea that the child wants to be "right" w/ the parent works. These are what a handful of us call the "easy" kids. Sure, there are struggles, but they can be resolved w/in the attachment relationship. The child seems as upset as the parent when they are in conflict. And then there are kids like mine, who are not "easy". Some of these children have been diagnoses w/ conditions like ODD, ADHD, autism spectrum, etc. Others have not, or have not been tested. We are currently looking into having one, if not both, of our children evaluated for these sorts of conditions.
But I still need discipline ideas. I love the ideal of attachment theory, but it's a long-term solution/goal. What do I do in the moment? I cannot remember the last time we got through a day without a meltdown, usually more than one. We make sure they're physically right (fed, enough sleep, not overly scheduled), and I can predict when something is physicallly not right. But sometimes, usually!, there's no such convenient explantion. It seems like there's a huge gap for the big kids between attachment theory and actual, practical, day-to-day options that don't involve punitive discipline/behaviorism.

Generally speaking, I would say to continue to hang in there! Positive Discipline is such a long journey, and it looks different for every family. Seeking support during the rough times is so important, so I'm glad you're here!
I don't think we have to stay "cheerful" at all when disciplining our kids. Raising kids is difficult and emotionally draining, and some periods will be more difficult than others. I think it's normal and OK to react by not feeling posisitive all the time. It makes you sad that he can't be trusted to be alone with his friends, and that is OK to feel like that.
Probably our (my) biggest challenge is his inability to handle frustration and life not going as expected. This always been a struggle for him; he is quite inflexible, needs to know exactly what to expect from a given situation, and cannot change gears when life throws in unexpected curves. Which, of course, is exactly how life is! When he was a toddler and preschooler, we'd have what DH and I used to call "repeat and redo meltdowns" where he would want to turn back time and redo an event so it happened the way he expected. We could have an hour meltdown because I opened the car door from him instead of letting him open it himself (he would not have asked to open it beforehand, he'd just have a mental image of that happening and when it didn't he couldn't accept it). Simply shutting the door and letting him open it would not help at that point. Now that he's older, it more often takes the form of temper tantrums over consequences for his actions. He forgot his shoes (losing and forgetting shoes is SO common) on Sunday when we were going to have fireworks at his grandparents. No shoes = no poppers or sparklers, as they just aren't safe. Also no helping to kick the spent fireworks into the gutter and hosing them off (bare feet & potentially hot fireworks also not safe). We tried to find solutions - Grandma offered a pair of her shoes w/ tight laces to hold them on, which he wouldn't wear. Sister gave him HER shoes and wore Grandma's, which should have solved the problem, but he refused to let go of the upset and move on. It was actually suprising, given the usual state of sibling relations around here, both that sister offered her shoes and that he consented to wear pink girl shoes. Commence meltdown, which at this point usually takes the form of screaming verbal garbage at us ("It's all your fault. I hate you. You're the worst parents in the world."), trying to create "fairness" by denying his sister whatever he isn't getting ("If I can't do fireworks, then Fiona (his twin sister) can't either."), and making demands ("I won't ___ (calm down, talk to you, have a drink, take a break, whatever) until I get to set off fireworks"). All this at top volume while hitting and kicking anyone who gets close enough, followed by throwing toys, kicking me and my husband, kicking my husband's car seat hard enough to break the plastic, refusing to stay in his own car seat. I would like to say this is an extreme example, but we have meltdowns of some variety daily and the kicking, hitting, destructive variety at least once a week.
Comment